Quick Navigation
Great Lakes Congressional Watch
- Congressional Winners and Losers (127)
- Governors (6)
- Mayors (2)
- US House (20)
- US Senate (27)
- White House (78)
Implementation Program
climate-change-and-the-Great-Lakes
In the News
Success Stories
Policy
- Areas of Concern (41)
- Asian Carp Barrier Act (21)
- Farm Bill (2)
- Great Lakes Collaboration Implementation Act (22)
- Great Lakes Ecosystem Protection Act (5)
- Great Lakes Regional Collaboration (18)
- Great Lakes Restoration Initiative (10)
- National Aquatic Invasive Species Act (5)
Jobs & Economic Recovery
Take Action
Threats
- Aquatic Invasive Species (46)
- Asian Carp (8)
- Habitat Destruction (2)
- Polluted Run-off (3)
- Sewage Contamination and Beach Closings (6)
- Toxic Pollution (6)
Your Lake & You
Activities
Your Stories & Photos
Related Links
- Facebook Healthy Lakes, Healthy Lives site
- Great Lakes Blogger
- Great Lakes For All
- Great Lakes Forever
- Great Lakes Guy
- Great Lakes Information Network
- Great Lakes Regional Collaboration
- Great Lakes Town Hall
- Great Lakes Wiki
- Green Sportsmen
- Loon commons
- MySpace Healthy Lakes, Healthy Lives site
- Password Protected Campaign Site
- Sky Blue Waters
- Ted William’s Conservation Corner
- The Political Environment
- Uppity Wisconsin
Archives
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- July 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- December 2004
- October 2004
- September 2004
- July 2004
- May 2004
- April 2003
Advisors to Great Lakes Fishery Commission Frustrated over Inaction
The U.S. and Canadian Advisors just released a resolution urging the Great Lakes Fishery Commission and its Commissioners on the need to regulate aquatic invasive species from ballast water.
It speaks frankly to the progress (or lack of) in the federal government curbing invasive species introductions when it says:
“Whereas, current ballast water regulations have proven ineffective inasmuch as the rate of aquatic invasive species introductions has not slowed, and
Whereas, governmental action on legislation, regulation, and funding to remedy this serious problem has been woefully lacking, and
Whereas, meaningful, comprehensive AIS legislation has not been implemented in either the United States or Canada, despite broad consensus in the Great Lakes region that it should…”
It also notes something not talked about as much as it should be:
“Whereas, ballast water may provide a vector for human and fish and wildlife pathogens to enter Great Lakes waters”…seriously, if inadequately regulated ballast was the source of even a small, localized disease outbreak that contaminated drinking water all hell would break loose.
Then it concludes:
“Therefore be it Resolved that the U.S. and Canadian Advisors urge the Great Lakes Fishery Commission and its Commissioners to support the immediate passage of comprehensive federal legislation in both countries to prevent the introduction of aquatic invasive species, with special emphasis on ballast water regulations.
Be it further resolved that the U.S. and Canadian Advisors ask that the Commission and its Commissioners support a moratorium on entrance of oceangoing vessels into the Great Lakes until effective methods of ballast water treatments are implemented.”
The Great Lakes Fishery Commission has long been on the front of the push for comprehensive federal legislation on invasive species, and was heavily involved in the development of the Great Lakes Regional Collaborations invasive species recommendations. So why is this noteworthy?
1. Who the advisors are: they represent mostly sport and commercial fishing interests, appointed by the governors (or the ministry of natural resources and the department of fisheries and oceans in Canada) to advise on issues important to the health and sustainability of the fishery.
2. This issue is of such importance to the fishery that this is the first joint U.S. and Canadian resolution released.
3. The advisors are charged with making recommendations to the high-level Great Lakes Fishery Commission on its duties. So, basically, the Commission has been further supported in its ongoing work to secure federal legislation on invasive species. It also for the first time has been emboldened to take a position supporting a moratorium.
Cliff notes: aquatic invasive species are such a threat to the health and sustainability of the fishery, fishing interests recommend that ocean vessels be restricted from the Great Lakes until legislation is passed and ballast regulated.
Leave a Reply
