Quick Navigation
Great Lakes Congressional Watch
- Congressional Winners and Losers (37)
- Current Events (40)
- District Meetings (2)
- Heard on the Hill (43)
- Hearings (18)
- Office Visits (14)
- Presidential Tracking Poll (41)
- Quote of the Week (2)
- Show Me the Money (19)
- Sign-on Letters (1)
- Speeches (7)
- Stumping for the White House (62)
- Testimony (4)
Policy
- Asian Carp Barrier Act (15)
- Economics of Restoration (67)
- Farm Bill (5)
- Great Lakes Collaboration Implementation Act (77)
- Great Lakes Regional Collaboration (50)
- National Aquatic Invasive Species Act (27)
- Project Inventory (7)
- Shipping Moratorium (7)
- Staffer Briefing (19)
Take Action
- Actions You Can Take (18)
- Contact Legislator (20)
- Petition (6)
- Spread the Word (8)
- Success Story (2)
News & Events
- Editorial (4)
- Events (13)
- Great Lakes Around the Web (22)
- News Story (21)
- Press Release (59)
- Report (18)
Threats
- Aquatic Invasive Species (68)
- Habitat Destruction (24)
- Polluted Run-off (23)
- Sewage Contamination and Beach Closings (38)
- Toxic Pollution (32)
Your Lake & You
Activities
Stories
Areas of Concern
Boat Tour
About Us
Related Links
- Facebook Healthy Lakes, Healthy Lives site
- Great Lakes Blogger
- Great Lakes For All
- Great Lakes Forever
- Great Lakes Guy
- Great Lakes Information Network
- Great Lakes Regional Collaboration
- Great Lakes Town Hall
- Great Lakes Wiki
- Green Sportsmen
- Loon commons
- MySpace Healthy Lakes, Healthy Lives site
- Password Protected Campaign Site
- Sky Blue Waters
- Ted William’s Conservation Corner
- The Political Environment
- Uppity Wisconsin
Archives
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- July 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- December 2004
- October 2004
- September 2004
- July 2004
- May 2004
- April 2003
Wisconsin Joins Michigan In Ballast Battle
Wisconsin has taken steps to join Michigan as the second state to regulate ballast water in the Great Lakes sending a clear signal to Washington that absent Congressional leadership and legislation, the state is prepared take the initiative to create ad hoc ballast controls. As it turns out, the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources has the legal authority to regulate ballast water discharges under the state’s Pollutant Discharge Elimination System so international shippers may soon have to apply for permits for discharges into Lakes Michigan and Superior.
Wisconsin’s determination of its legal authority to regulate ballast water under existing state laws was prompted by a request from the Wisconsin Wildlife Federation and twelve other conservation groups. It may have also been responding to an appeal made by Michigan Governor Jennifer Granholm to her counterparts in surrounding states and Canada late last year. Using her state’s ballast law as an example, she argued that the region could create an ad hoc ballast law that would protect the Great Lakes from what is moving toward soon-to-be irrevocable damages that invasives produce.
The lakes are at a tipping point, according to scientists. There are so many invasive species in the lakes with new ones appearing every 28 weeks – that waiting any longer will mean a destroyed ecosystem. Invasive species are introduced into the Great Lakes in the ballast water of ocean going vessels. They wreak havoc on the fresh water ecology and cost state economies millions.
There is pending federal legislation that would create a national treatment standard for ballast water, but at the moment it is pending due to some concerns which are currently being negotiated.
Granholm wrote: “…effective congressional action to address aquatic invasive species and ballast water discharge is not assured.” She adds, “Without an effective federal response, I believe the states have a responsibility to act.”
Her letter comes on the heels of a federal court decision upholding Michigan’s ballast law in a suit brought by shipping companies. More cautious states had been taking a wait- and-see approach but now have a green light to act.
“This decision is a tremendous victory for Michigan and for any state desiring to protect its waters from the massive harm caused by introductions of invasive species from foreign shipping via ballast water,” the letter reads.
And it isn’t expensive either. The letter points out that 73 ships from nearly 30 different companies applied for permits and each paid a $75 application fee. This offsets the costs making implementation cost-effective.
“Again, I urge you to join Michigan in protecting the Great Lakes…We should seize the opportunity for coordinated state regulation to prevent the economic and environmental damage that could be caused by the next species to arrive in ballast water.”
Granholm’s imperative call to action and Wisconsin’s recent commitment to control ballast discharges is another sign to Congress that they should do all they can to work out the more controversial aspects from the Ballast Bill of 2007 and pass it as quickly as possible. If not, states may end up with piecemeal, ad hoc, regional ballast regulations that could cause shippers more headaches and will certainly lend to a decentralized, difficult-to-manage ballast system. States are serious about ending the worst threat to the Great Lakes, is Congress?
Granholm sent her appeal to:
Pennsylvania Gov. Edward Rendell
Honorable Jean Charest, Premier
Honorable Dalton McGuinty, Premier
Leave a Reply
