Quick Navigation
Great Lakes Congressional Watch
- Congressional Winners and Losers (127)
- Governors (6)
- Mayors (2)
- US House (21)
- US Senate (27)
- White House (78)
Implementation Program
climate-change-and-the-Great-Lakes
In the News
Success Stories
Policy
- Areas of Concern (41)
- Asian Carp Barrier Act (21)
- Farm Bill (2)
- Great Lakes Collaboration Implementation Act (22)
- Great Lakes Ecosystem Protection Act (5)
- Great Lakes Regional Collaboration (18)
- Great Lakes Restoration Initiative (11)
- National Aquatic Invasive Species Act (5)
Jobs & Economic Recovery
Take Action
Threats
- Aquatic Invasive Species (46)
- Asian Carp (8)
- Habitat Destruction (2)
- Polluted Run-off (3)
- Sewage Contamination and Beach Closings (7)
- Toxic Pollution (6)
Your Lake & You
Activities
Your Stories & Photos
Related Links
- Facebook Healthy Lakes, Healthy Lives site
- Great Lakes Blogger
- Great Lakes For All
- Great Lakes Forever
- Great Lakes Guy
- Great Lakes Information Network
- Great Lakes Regional Collaboration
- Great Lakes Town Hall
- Great Lakes Wiki
- Green Sportsmen
- Loon commons
- MySpace Healthy Lakes, Healthy Lives site
- Password Protected Campaign Site
- Sky Blue Waters
- Ted William’s Conservation Corner
- The Political Environment
- Uppity Wisconsin
Archives
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- July 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- December 2004
- October 2004
- September 2004
- July 2004
- May 2004
- April 2003
Michigan AG Asks Court To Reconsider Lock Closure; Study Shows Illinois Exaggerated Economic Impact
Michigan Attorney General Mike Cox has filed a new motion with the US Supreme Court asking for an immediate injunction to close Chicago-area locks because the Court did not have all the information (ie that Carp eDNA was already in Lake Michigan) when they rejected the first motion. In addition, a study by Wayne State University transportation experts draws serious doubts over Illinois’ claim that even a temporary closure of the locks would devastate the local economy.
Cox has seized on the revelation that new eDNA evidence that the Asian carp were in Lake Michigan was available three days before the Supreme Court made it’s decision, but was not released to the public until after the Court denied the injunction. Apparently, in earlier legal filings the Feds and Illinois promised to “revisit the conclusions related to lock closure” if new information became available. Cox is hanging this latest attempt on these words.
Michigan is supported in this suit by Pennsylvania, New York, Wisconsin, Ohio, Minnesota and Ontario in Canada. But the Supreme Court still has not decided to hear the case and if they do it won’t happen until late February – in the meantime, it is essential that those locks are closed since they are the major entryway for the Asian carp into the Great Lakes ecosystem.
Illinois has the support of the Obama Administration in their effort to keep the locks open. They have argued that closing them – even temporarily while the court makes their decision – would force them to lose millions of dollars and thousands of jobs. But a new report, Chicago Waterway System Ecological Separation: The Logistics and Transportation Related Cost Impact of Waterway Barriers by John Taylor, PhD and James Roach – transportation experts at Wayne State University – found that these claims were “seriously exaggerated.” Taylor finds that the annual cost of closure would amount to $70 million and not $190 million as Illinois claims.
And they aren’t the only ones exaggerating! On a recent PBS NewsHour broadcast, Del Wilkins of Illinois Marine Towing told reporters that the Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal system moves 16.9 million tons of cargo. This is sharply contrasted by the study that found that in 2008 only 39 “loaded barges” used the Chicago Lock carrying 105,000 tons of cargo. Maybe Wilkins was talking about a century’s worth of deliveries and not one year.
Experts also said that a barrier at the Chicago Lock would have little effect on shippers on the North and South Branches of the Chicago River. “The large majority of cargo to these shippers passes through the CSSC and would be unaffected by the closure of either the Chicago or O’Brien locks.” In fact, the canal system would largely remain open to barge traffic after a lock closure – even so – it must be noted that cargo that runs through the O’Brien Lock has been down in recent years by 45 percent. Cox points out that this shows it is a industry in decline and isn’t as significant to Chicago’s $521 billion economy as some would have us think.
Some (in the barge industry) have argued that trucks and rail wouldn’t have the capacity to move cargo as efficiently, but this study finds that truck traffic would only increase by 1/10 of 1 percent while closing the locks would bring jobs to the region as new modes of transporting goods – like trucking – would be necessary.
In every Great Lakes state the effort to stop the Asian carp has been bipartisan – another example of the extent of this crisis to our region’s economy. When President Obama introduced the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative in 2009 he pledged zero tolerance for new invasive species. (That is literally the only statement we have from the President on Asian carp.) So why is his US Solicitor General Elena Kagan supporting the state of Illinois and their exaggerated economic statistics? Especially when even the bloated dollar signs Illinois is pushing do not come anywhere near the billions of lost dollars the eight state region and Canada will suffer if the Asian carp are allowed to populate the Great Lakes.
2 Responses to “Michigan AG Asks Court To Reconsider Lock Closure; Study Shows Illinois Exaggerated Economic Impact”
Leave a Reply

February 17th, 2010 at 7:51 pm
What the have you been smokin? Get a grip on reality and quit trying to swashbuckle the public with this false information. NO CARP WERE FOUND TODAY! LIVE WITH THE FACT, YOU HAVE USED THIS FOR YOUR OWN POLITICAL GAIN.
February 19th, 2010 at 2:09 pm
If I’m smokin’ then everyone is smokin’ since everyone accepts the eDNA results as valid and scientific. Ck out this AP story: http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/M/MI_ASIAN_CARP_GREAT_LAKES?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2010-02-18-23-59-32