Quick Navigation
Great Lakes Congressional Watch
- Congressional Winners and Losers (116)
- Governors (7)
- Mayors (2)
- US House (18)
- US Senate (25)
- White House (76)
In the News
Success Stories
Policy
- Areas of Concern (45)
- Asian Carp Barrier Act (22)
- Farm Bill (4)
- Great Lakes Collaboration Implementation Act (33)
- Great Lakes Regional Collaboration (23)
- Great Lakes Restoration Initiative (8)
- National Aquatic Invasive Species Act (7)
Jobs & Economic Recovery
Fiscal Accountablity
Take Action
Threats
- Aquatic Invasive Species (44)
- Habitat Destruction (2)
- Polluted Run-off (3)
- Sewage Contamination and Beach Closings (5)
- Toxic Pollution (6)
Your Lake & You
Activities
Your Stories & Photos
Related Links
- Facebook Healthy Lakes, Healthy Lives site
- Great Lakes Blogger
- Great Lakes For All
- Great Lakes Forever
- Great Lakes Guy
- Great Lakes Information Network
- Great Lakes Regional Collaboration
- Great Lakes Town Hall
- Great Lakes Wiki
- Green Sportsmen
- Loon commons
- MySpace Healthy Lakes, Healthy Lives site
- Password Protected Campaign Site
- Sky Blue Waters
- Ted William’s Conservation Corner
- The Political Environment
- Uppity Wisconsin
Archives
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- July 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- December 2004
- October 2004
- September 2004
- July 2004
- May 2004
- April 2003
$50 Billion in Economic Benefit Hinge on Restoration of Great Lakes
Cost to restore and protect the Great Lakes: $26 Billion.
Cost of creating sustainable economic growth and reviving the industrial heartland of America: Priceless.
It has been called the Rust Belt since the early ‘70s when the once thriving Great Lakes region – a producer of steel, metal and automobiles that attracted workers from around the world – fell victim to globalization and then the information economy. Factories and mills closed and crestfallen populations of workers migrated away in search of jobs. But leading economists are releasing a report today showing that investing in the Great Lakes Collaboration Strategy (GLCS) has potential to economically revitalize the struggling region.
Each year, Rust Belt states average less than 2 percent of new growth, according to the 2004 Census. Yet, Great Lakes states are home to one-third of the nation’s population and produce one-third of the gross state product. Developing America’s North Coast: A Benefit Cost Analysis of a Great Lakes Infrastructure Program, promises that fulfilling the $26 billion investment (over the next five years) to implement the GLCS would actually produce $50 billion in long term economic benefits – not only paying for itself, but creating a net gain of at least $24 billion. In fact, there is potential for a new growth industry founded on freshwater innovation for heating, cooling, sanitation and food – an emerging magnet for skilled workers. Is there a financial advisor anywhere that would question such an investment?
The Brookings Institute report is being released today to kick off the third annual Great Lakes Restoration Conference in Chicago, Ill.
The conference, and new economics report, come at a significant time as legislation to implement the restoration strategy has been introduced in Congress and is awaiting action.
Read the report, “Healthy Waters, Strong Economy: The Benefits of Restoring the Great Lakes Ecosystem.”
“Healthy Waters, Strong Economy” summarizes the major findings of a more in-depth study of the benefits and costs of the GLRC Strategy by the same authors, “America’s North Coast: A Benefit-Cost Analysis of a Program to Protect and Restore the Great Lakes,” which is being released on the same day.
Use these links to learn more:
- In-depth Study: America’s North Coast: A Benefit-Cost Analysis of a Program to Protect and Restore the Great Lakes
- Summary Report of Major Findings: Healthy Waters, Strong Economy
- Announcement press release
- Press conference presentation
- Elected officials’ reactions
We’d love for you to download the study yourself and share the findings with others.Are you a blogger looking for something to write about? Oct. 15 is Blog Action Day, when bloggers are encouraged to post about environmental issues. This is an excellent chance for you to share your thoughts on this study and why you care about benefiting the Great Lakes and the region’s economic situation.
If you mention the study on your blog, we’ll post a link to your site and list you in our Study Blogroll. You can also set a trackback to this link for your post to be inserted as a comment to this page.
14 Responses to “$50 Billion in Economic Benefit Hinge on Restoration of Great Lakes”
Leave a Reply

September 5th, 2007 at 12:05 pm
[...] $50 Billion in Economic Benefit Hinge on Restoration of Great Lakes [...]
June 30th, 2009 at 8:54 am
[...] we know that there are specific and tangible economic benefits linked to a healthy Great Lakes and St. Lawrence River. We need to be restoring this magnificent [...]
July 22nd, 2009 at 12:25 pm
[...] This bill’s passage would have an incredible economic impact on the region. The Brookings Report announced earlier this year that if fully implemented, the initiatives laid out by the Great Lakes [...]
July 23rd, 2009 at 2:57 pm
[...] Great Lakes are increasingly seen as an economic asset. According to a Brookings Institution study, investing $26 billion to restore the Great Lakes will lead to at least $50 billion in economic [...]
July 27th, 2009 at 7:15 am
[...] as a prime concern to keep momentum going for their candidate. If that is the case, then the Brookings report detailing how restoration would not only save the lakes but recharge the Great Lake states economic [...]
July 27th, 2009 at 7:17 am
[...] Or, just perhaps, they just don’t get it. It could be that they don’t realize they are dealing with an issue that evokes visceral responses from the residents of the eight Great Lakes States, the stewards of 90 percent of our nation’s fresh water supply. They don’t understand how deeply we care about the Lakes, how much we really want restoration and the resulting revitalization of an entire region’s economy… [...]
July 27th, 2009 at 7:18 am
[...] there is a strategy that will return vitality to this region. A Brookings Institution study finds that by investing in restoration efforts, the United States would effectively jump start [...]
July 27th, 2009 at 7:25 am
[...] 90 percent of our nation’s – surface fresh water. We have learned from economists with the Brookings Institution that spending that $26 billion would generate a$50 billion profit. So, it truly is pay as you go – [...]
July 27th, 2009 at 7:29 am
[...] The Healthy Waters, Strong Economy:The Benefits of Restoring the Great Lakes Ecosystem report released by Brookings Institute last week was authored by distinguished economist, Robert Litan. Currently, Litan is Vice President of Research and Policy at the Kauffman Foundation and is a Senior Fellow with Brookings in Washington, DC. Litan has also served as Associate Director of the Office of Management and Budget (’95-’96) and as Deputy Assistant Attorney General at the Justice Department, in charge of the Antitrust Division (’93-’95). He brought his esteemed analytical skills to this project, the result of which found that spending $26 billion to implement the Great Lakes Collaboration Implementation Act – the embodiment of the Great Lakes Regional Collaboration blueprint – would generate more than $50 billion in long-term economic benefit for the region. The Great Lakes would be restored, jobs would be created, property values would see a boost, wastewater treatment costs would go down and new business and new residents would be attracted to the region. After discussing the findings of this landmark economic analysis at the annual Healing Our Waters conference, he took a few minutes to speak with HOW’s blogger. [...]
July 27th, 2009 at 7:34 am
[...] new report confirms in dollars and cents that the health of the Great Lakes economy depends on the health of [...]
October 1st, 2009 at 8:08 am
[...] Now, I’m sure you see where I’m going with this – it is all about priorities. For what it costs us to be at war for two months in Iraq and three months in Afghanistan we could fully restore the Great Lakes, provide hundreds of thousands of jobs, raise property values, and revive the economy of the entire region. [...]
October 1st, 2009 at 8:19 am
[...] if the nation were to invest in the Great Lakes restoration plan the region and the nation would gain a 2-to-1 return on the investment – but it has to happen now, before climate change intensifies the problems plaguing the [...]
October 1st, 2009 at 8:24 am
[...] region and they have focused on the economy during their visits. Last year, Brookings Institution released a report that finds that by restoring the Great Lakes, hundreds of thousands of jobs would be created in our [...]
October 1st, 2009 at 8:27 am
[...] up and protect the Great Lakes and their environs. A study just released by leading national economists for the Brookings Institution describes how federal follow-through on an already agreed upon $26 billion Great Lakes Restoration [...]