Quick Navigation
Great Lakes Congressional Watch
- Congressional Winners and Losers (115)
- Governors (7)
- Mayors (2)
- US House (18)
- US Senate (25)
- White House (76)
In the News
Success Stories
Policy
- Areas of Concern (45)
- Asian Carp Barrier Act (22)
- Farm Bill (4)
- Great Lakes Collaboration Implementation Act (33)
- Great Lakes Regional Collaboration (23)
- Great Lakes Restoration Initiative (8)
- National Aquatic Invasive Species Act (7)
Jobs & Economic Recovery
Fiscal Accountablity
Take Action
Threats
- Aquatic Invasive Species (44)
- Habitat Destruction (2)
- Polluted Run-off (3)
- Sewage Contamination and Beach Closings (5)
- Toxic Pollution (6)
Your Lake & You
Activities
Your Stories & Photos
Related Links
- Facebook Healthy Lakes, Healthy Lives site
- Great Lakes Blogger
- Great Lakes For All
- Great Lakes Forever
- Great Lakes Guy
- Great Lakes Information Network
- Great Lakes Regional Collaboration
- Great Lakes Town Hall
- Great Lakes Wiki
- Green Sportsmen
- Loon commons
- MySpace Healthy Lakes, Healthy Lives site
- Password Protected Campaign Site
- Sky Blue Waters
- Ted William’s Conservation Corner
- The Political Environment
- Uppity Wisconsin
Archives
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- July 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- December 2004
- October 2004
- September 2004
- July 2004
- May 2004
- April 2003
Does The White House Plan Add Up to Zero Tolerance for Asian Carp?
The White House has promised a zero tolerance policy toward new invasive species and they believe that the draft Asian Carp Control Strategy Framework released today at the summit meeting with Great Lakes Governors is proof positive that they are taking this issue seriously.
White House Counsel for Environmental Quality Chief, Nancy Sutley described the multitier plan of defense as evidence of an unparalleled federal effort. Charles Wooley, deputy regional director for the Fish and Wildlife Service pronounced with conviction “we are doing everything humanly possible to keep these fish out of Lake Michigan.”
Except shutting the locks. Michigan’s Governor Jennifer Granholm and Wisconsin’s Governor Jim Doyle left the meeting without saying they would stop trying to get the Supreme Court to agree to an injunction that would force the locks to close until a more permanent solution could be implemented.
“We did not discuss the legal action with the Governors,” Sutley admitted and added, ”that will just go on as it was.”
Governor Granholm acknowledged that a lot of work went into this proposal, but she was left “very disappointed.” “We have to prevent Asian carp from entering the Great Lakes, but the proposal presented still leaves the lakes vulnerable to this threat.” She then called for the closing of the locks between the Chicago Sanitary Ship Canal electrical barrier and Lake Michigan.
Right now the locks in question open and close whenever a boat or barge presents itself. The White House has offered a compromise – a modified lock closure – and what that boils down to is a schedule for opening and closing the locks. They would also provide some sort of treatment, possibly fish poison, each time they open the locks to prevent any Asian carp that may be there from moving through the waterway.
Andy Buchsbaum, co-chair of HOW, said the plan, ”leaves the details of when and how long the locks would be closed and how the poison would be used until later.”
In a press conference following the summit, the Feds said that they are not willing to close the locks permanently yet. Not until they have had time to “consider all factors” and can “make a decision whether it is in everyone’s interest to close the locks.”
One problem that CEQ’s Sutley pointed to is that there may be other pathways for the carp to get to the lakes such as the connection between the Mississippi watershed and the Great Lakes watershed. “Closing the locks are only two pathways,” she said.
Both Michigan officials and HOW have called for a permanent physical and biological separation of the Great Lakes and Mississippi River Basins to stop the fish from using the rivers as entryways into the lakes. Sutley said that the Army Corps of Engineers is studying whether changing this connections would make sense. But right now, the framework does not require such a separation. Because of that Gov. Granholm said, “I believe the proposal’s primary objectives are not sustainable, and that this is a plan to limit damages – not solve the problem.”
Leave a Reply
