Quick Navigation
Great Lakes Congressional Watch
- Congressional Winners and Losers (127)
- Governors (6)
- Mayors (2)
- US House (21)
- US Senate (27)
- White House (78)
Implementation Program
climate-change-and-the-Great-Lakes
In the News
Success Stories
Policy
- Areas of Concern (41)
- Asian Carp Barrier Act (21)
- Farm Bill (2)
- Great Lakes Collaboration Implementation Act (22)
- Great Lakes Ecosystem Protection Act (5)
- Great Lakes Regional Collaboration (18)
- Great Lakes Restoration Initiative (11)
- National Aquatic Invasive Species Act (5)
Jobs & Economic Recovery
Take Action
Threats
- Aquatic Invasive Species (46)
- Asian Carp (8)
- Habitat Destruction (2)
- Polluted Run-off (3)
- Sewage Contamination and Beach Closings (7)
- Toxic Pollution (6)
Your Lake & You
Activities
Your Stories & Photos
Related Links
- Facebook Healthy Lakes, Healthy Lives site
- Great Lakes Blogger
- Great Lakes For All
- Great Lakes Forever
- Great Lakes Guy
- Great Lakes Information Network
- Great Lakes Regional Collaboration
- Great Lakes Town Hall
- Great Lakes Wiki
- Green Sportsmen
- Loon commons
- MySpace Healthy Lakes, Healthy Lives site
- Password Protected Campaign Site
- Sky Blue Waters
- Ted William’s Conservation Corner
- The Political Environment
- Uppity Wisconsin
Archives
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- July 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- December 2004
- October 2004
- September 2004
- July 2004
- May 2004
- April 2003
Asian Carp Get Hearing on Hill
In the midst of back-to-back snowstorm that have disabled Washington, several members of the House Transportation Committee met for a hearing on the Asian Carp crisis.
But even though the audience was small, the news was not – the Federal Government is strongly considering permanently separating the Great Lakes and Mississippi River Basins as a long-term solution to the carp crisis. In the short term, the Army Corps refuses to shut the locks until they have been able to complete a study of the impact of doing so, not just on the carp and the lakes but on the local economy and barge industry.
“If we were to close the locks they would need to be shown effective as impediments to Asian carp movement. We are actively studying whether we should close them but we need a vast amount of information on impacts and consequences. This is a very complex issue there are orders of magnitude impact that we cannot understand until we complete our studies,” US Army Corps General John Peabody answered Rep. Jim Oberstar (DFL-Minn.), Chair of the T&I Committee.
“We would highly recommend we exhaust every other option before we look at the effects of closing the locks,” responded Del Wilkins, VP of Canal Barge Company Inc. who testified for the American Waterways Operators. Wilkins spent the hearing in damage control mode in an effort to ensure barge operators stay in business. This became more difficult after Joel Brammeier of the Alliance for the Great Lakes testified that the volume of cargo traffic that needs to move from the Mississippi River to the Great Lakes is less than one percent and therefore fairly insignificant in comparison to the economic damage the carp will leave in their wake.
“These next few years are a tremendous opportunity,” Brammeier told Rep. Oberstar. “This is a great time to be thinking big and what we need to do not just in the short term to deal with the carp but how we can make change in the long term,” he said in an effort to push basin separation.
“Ecological separation is a huge game changer,” Wilkins opined. “It would eliminate a lot of jobs, not just in the barge industry.”
But Michigan Officials are still fighting to close the locks. After the White House Summit on Monday, Michigan Governor Jennifer Granholm promised to continue the legal challenge to close the locks and called on the Federal Government to think more long-term. At the hearing, Michigan Department of Natural Resources Rebecca Humphries reiterated that the state won’t be satisfied unless the locks are closed and a permanent separation is erected. “What is at the crux of this is where are we going with the long term. Is our goal to physically separate these watersheds or is it not? Because it does make a difference as to how we address this in the short term. We do not feel that continuing the operate the lock structure and poisoning off those waters on a regular basis is a sustainable strategy.”
One of the more telling points made during the hearing was by Great Lakes Czar Cam Davis. When asked if the right authorities and legislative structures were in place to deal with this problem he replied, “the real question on the table is, have we been able to act fast enough, and the clear answer is no, we haven’t.
Leave a Reply
